DRUNKEN DRIVING DEFENSE LAWYERS OF ILLINOIS LTD.

It's Monday September 27, 2004...

CONTACT US 

 

  312-263-4422

Home Page

 

HOME 

FAQs

 

DUI PENALTIES

Contact

 

SUMMARY
SUSPENSION
PENALTIES

Catalog

 

FAQ'S

Site Map

 

SAMPLE CASES

 

           

Free Confidential Online Questionnaire

Assertion of Rights

Blood Alcohol Content Calculator

DUI Law

DUI Penalties

DUI Penalties for BAC .16 or Greater

DUI Penalties for a BAC of .08 or greater and a Child under 16 in the Vehicle

Penalties for Other Alcohol Related Offenses

Summary Suspension Law

Illinois Zero Tolerance Law

Reckless Homicide

History of DUI Law in Illinois

                 

 
 
 

SAMPLE CASES

Tickets involved:

  • Driving under the influence of B.A.C. above a .08
    • Actual B.A.C. .262
  • DUI under the influence
  • Possession open alcohol by driver
  • Improper lane usage; striking parked vehicles
  • Leaving scene vehicle damage accident

 

*   This case was a complete victory. All charges were dismissed

 

CASE SUMMARY:

On his way home our client struck two parked cars located two blocks away from his home. After striking the cars, two men appeared on the scene and said that they were the owners of the cars. Our client becomes afraid and starts to panic. He then asks these two men what he can do so that they would not call the police These men say that if our client gives them some money they will not call the police. Then these men become insistent that they want money. Our client doesn't have much on him so they decide to go to our client’s residence. During this time someone who had seen the accident called the police. The police arrive and find our client near his vehicle. As the police approach our client, he admits freely that he had struck one of the vehicles and also admits to drinking. During this conversation our client is unable to stand on his own he needs to lean onto his vehicle for support.

As he’s leaning on his vehicle he is asked many questions and gives many answers (non of the answers are in his favor). As our client is standing there swaying unable to stand still he is asked to perform some field sobriety tests. Upon trying to perform these field sobriety tests he tries to moves himself away from the car and is unable to stand on his own.

During the finger to nose test our client almost falls down and the officer actually has to catch him so he doesn’t hit the ground and on the other tests his performance is just as bad. Upon failure of all these tests our client is taken into custody and driven to the station where he takes a breath test. The result of this test is a reading of  .262. As dire as this case looked, through the diligent representation and motion practice of DDDL we were able to have all of his charges dismissed and remove all mention of this from his record.


Tickets involved:

§        Improper lane usage

§        Failure to stop at a stop sign

§        Driving under the influence of alcohol

§        Driving under the influence of alcohol with B.A.C. above a .08

o      Actual .156 B.A.C

 

CASE SUMMARY:

This case involves a police officer who has nothing better to do than to follow a car driving down the roadway looking for mistakes. While following our client the officer watches our client weave from double yellow line to curb several times. While this driving on its own may not be a ticket-able offense (since it is not an improper lane usage at this point) but according to the law in Illinois, this driving could be enough just to stop a vehicle for further investigation.

The police officer watches our client come to a stop past the stop line and watches our client’s brake lights go on but he says she never comes to a complete stop. At this point he thinks that she may be under the influence but, he still doesn’t stop her. The police officer still wants to develop some more evidence for his case, so he follows her further down the road and sees our client drift over to the left into the oncoming traffic lane of a two lane road very briefly. At this time the officer initiates a traffic stop and pulls our client over.

Our client pulls into a parking lot, which is a safer area to pull over then the street side. Upon approaching, the officer speaks with our client. He asks where she’s coming from and she says from a casino boat. Next, he asks her if she had been drinking and she says she has had wine at the casino. While talking to our client, the police officer notices that her eyes are glassy and bloodshot. And while speaking with her decides that she has a strong odor of alcoholic beverage on her breath. Our client is then asked to recite the alphabet, which she does correctly. In the officer's report he states that the odor of alcohol was continuously strong during this recitation.

Even though our client recites the alphabet correctly she’s asked to exit the vehicle. As our client exits the vehicle the officer notices that she is walking with a stagger. In an effort to gather even more evidence, the officer asks our client to do some field sobriety tests. The first test that she’s asked to perform is the one-legged stand test. As she’s standing there the officer says that our client is swaying in all directions and can’t maintain her balance while listening to the instructions for this test. Also during this test our client places her foot down on the counts of 2, 7, 20, and then could not continue the test.

The officer next puts our client into the start position for the walk and turn test. At this time she is unable to stay in position and she is unable to maintain her balance while listening to instructions. During this test the officer says she stops to steady herself and does not touch heel to toe and on the way out she almost falls over. She then loses her balance while walking and raises her arms for balance. Further, during the turn she losses her balance and is unable to come back properly.

Next the officer gives her the Rohmburg balance test during which she sways and is unable to estimate thirty seconds (she stops at twenty five seconds).

The officer then performs the horizontal gave nystagmus test which in his estimation she fails completely.

Then the officer gives our client the hand held breath test which yields a result of a .122 B.A.C. and places her under arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol. After this, she is taken to the station where she is asked to perform another breath test which she does and this time the result is a BAC of .156.

After many months of preparation and motion work this case ultimately ended in the state dismissing all counts against our client and for our client this turned out to be total victory.


Tickets involved:

§        DUI under the influence of alcohol

§        DUI above a  .08

o      Actual: .143

§        Speeding 40 in a 30

§        Driving on a suspended drivers license

 CASE SUMMARY:

This arrest starts with a police officer who sees our client and paces him. Next the officer pulls our client over. Upon standing at the drivers door of our clients car, the officer in his opinion detects a strong odor of alcohol coming from our client’s breath. The officer then notices that our client’s face is red in color and his eyes are bloodshot. As the officer asks for our client's license and insurance he asks him to get out of the vehicle. As our client gets out of his vehicle the officer observes our client walks while swaying and that he sways while turning. The overall observation is that our clients balance is wobbly and his speech is slurred.

Our client was asked to perform many field sobriety tests. Our client's balance during these field sobriety tests is wobbling during the balance portion walking, swaying while turning and swaying during the picking up of coins. On the finger to nose test, the officer says that our client completely misses his nose with the left hand each and every time and completely misses his nose with the right hand each and every time.

After our client fails all of the field sobriety tests he is placed under arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol and then taken to the police station. Eventually, our client takes a breath test, which reveals an alcohol concentration of a .143.

After a lot of work and many pretrial motions in this case the case finally  culminated at a trial. At trial the judge acquitted our client of the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol,  acquitted our client for the charge of speeding and our client received a term of supervision for driving on a suspended drivers license. It was almost a complete victory for our client. Our client was very happy. Since this was not his first offense for driving under the influence, he would have lost his driving privileges had he been convicted.

 

 


 

Tickets involved:

  • Improper lighting; only one headlamp
  • Improper lane usage on a lane
  • Driving under the influence of alcohol
  • Driving under the influence of alcohol with a breath alcohol concentration above a .08
    • Actual .103

 

CASE SUMMARY:

An officer While on routine patrol observes a vehicle traveling with only one headlamp. This gives the police officer a reason to conduct a traffic stop but  wanted to find more violations In a effort to gather more evidence the police officer follows our client's vehicle for a period of time. During this observation period our client while driving crosses the center line on numerous occasions.

Now the officer stops our client and speaks with him. Upon speaking with the driver the officer states that he smells a strong odor of alcoholic beverage on the driver’s breath. The officer also notices that our clients eyes are bloodshot and glossy. At this point the officer asked our client to step out of the vehicle and perform field sobriety tests.

The tests performed in this case were the one-legged stand test, finger to nose test and the walk and turn test.

The one leg stand test: The officer characterized our clients agility as swaying and that our client needed to use his arms for balance, and that our client hoped, and that he puts his foot down. Overall our client fails this test.

Walk and turn: During this test our client uses his arms for balance and that he steps off the line. Also starting too early pausing for balance, turning improperly and does not touch heel to toe. Our client fails his test.

In order to further boost his case the officer in his police report writes that our client almost fell down numerous times during these filed sobriety tests.

Finger to nose test: during this test our client was not able to touch his nose at all at any time.

This case also had a video and between the hard work of our staff, reviewing the video and our motion practice we were able to convince the judge that this was a proper case to have the arrest quashed for lack of probable case. Once the arrest was quashed the breath test was not allowed to be introduced as evidence.  Not only was the breath test kept out, all the tickets were thrown out. This was a complete victory for the team of DDDL and the client


Tickets involved:

§        No city sticker

§        Following too closely

§        Driving under the influence of alcohol

§        No proof of insurance

 

CASE SUMMARY:

This arrest started as a call in response to a traffic accident in which our client and another vehicle had collided. In the officer’s recitation of facts he said that he arrived at the accident scene and approached one of the people involved in the accident and spoke with them. Next, the officer went to go talk to our client and found our client passed out in the driver’s seat of his vehicle. Upon approaching the vehicle the officer noticed that on the side of the drivers doors there was fresh vomit. After waking our client and speaking with our client, the officer detected a strong odor of alcoholic beverage on our client's breath. At this point our client was asked to perform several field sobriety tests including the horizontal gaze and nystagmus test.

In the officer's estimation, our client failed all the field sobriety tests given. The officers observations were that besides having strong odor of alcoholic beverage on his breath, the breath also smelled like vomit. Further that our client’s speech was slurred. It also must be noted that the officer stated that our client fumbled extremely through his paper work in his wallet to try to find his driver’s license and that as he got out of the vehicle our client had to hold on to the door for support. Further, our client had admitted to consuming beers prior to driving.

After the hard work of DDDL, the state dropped all the charges against our client. Leaving our client to enjoy a total victory.

 

 
     
   

 

 Back ] Home ]

DRUNKEN DRIVING DEFENSE LAWYERS OF ILLINOIS LTD.

 

Copyright © 2002 FP World  All Rights Reserved